- Triangle (Psychogeometrics)
- Dellinger's mission-driven type. Self-motivated, self-confident, high-energy, logical, gets things done. Strengths: drives the work forward, makes decisions quickly. Watch-outs: can be a poor listener, can be insensitive to people, can self-absorb. Dealing with a Triangle: give him something to do or you'll lose him; train him on soft skills; make the mission clear; don't beat around the bush with constructive feedback.
- Rectangle (Psychogeometrics)
- Dellinger's data-driven type. Attention to detail, methodical, accurate, hard-working, logical, excellent at gathering information. Strengths: gets the facts right; spots errors. Watch-outs: hesitant to decide without all the facts; treats process and methodology as equally important to results; can drive Triangles crazy. Dealing with a Rectangle: never delegate without follow-up; follow up periodically not constantly; make him responsible for graphs, numbers, data, research; positive feedback matters.
- Circle (Psychogeometrics)
- Dellinger's people-driven type. Great people skills, wants everyone happy, involves everyone, team player, often journey-oriented (in the moment). Strengths: builds relationships, harmonizes. Watch-outs: may not be mission-oriented; may not be process-oriented. Dealing with a Circle: give him constant positive reinforcement; nudge him to completion; remind him of the mission; listen to his observations about people, because he's usually right about them.
- Squiggle (Psychogeometrics)
- Dellinger's creativity-driven type. Fun, creative, idea-rich, great social energy, always ready for a party. Strengths: generates the new options nobody else thought of. Watch-outs: may not understand the mission or goal; little sense of urgency; doesn't always plan; prefers to wing it. Dealing with a Squiggle: put him in charge of celebrations, brainstorming, posters, themes, newsletters; let him communicate the mission; don't assign him mission-critical tasks expecting silent delivery — get explicit commitment.
- Psychogeometrics as folk taxonomy
- Honest caveat. Dellinger's four-shape model is widely taught in leadership training and useful as a shared vocabulary, but it isn't peer-reviewed personality psychology. The academic field uses the Big Five (OCEAN). Treat Psychogeometrics the way you'd treat a working-class vocabulary list: handy for the meeting, not a basis for diagnosis. Pair it with the Big Five when you want academic ground under the conversation.
- The Big Five (OCEAN)
- The academically validated model from personality psychology, five broad traits: Openness (to experience), Conscientiousness (organized vs. spontaneous), Extraversion (social energy direction), Agreeableness (cooperation vs. competition), Neuroticism (emotional volatility vs. stability). Each is a dimension, not a category. McCrae and Costa's research from the 1980s onward, replicated across cultures. Unlike Myers-Briggs, the Big Five has strong empirical support and is the working vocabulary of modern personality science.
- Conscientiousness (Big Five trait)
- The trait with the strongest published correlation with work and life outcomes. High conscientiousness: organized, planful, follows through, keeps commitments. Low conscientiousness: spontaneous, flexible, doesn't sweat details. Maxwell's Law of Process (leadership developed daily) bites harder for low-conscientiousness men, who need designed habits to compensate. The Craft's daily-practice ethos is conscientiousness training for everyone in the room.
- Different strokes (Blanchard)
- Ken Blanchard's published principle from The One Minute Manager (1982) and Leadership and the One Minute Manager (1985): there is no single best leadership style. Each person responds best to a different approach, and the leader's job is to adjust to the brother in front of him. The published phrase: "different strokes for different folks." The same lesson the Psychogeometrics types teach by another route.
- Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team
- Patrick Lencioni's published diagnostic pyramid (2002). Teams fail in a predictable order: absence of trust at the base → fear of conflict → lack of commitment → avoidance of accountability → inattention to results at the top. The pyramid lands in the personality-types chapter because trust requires reading the people in front of you. Personality typing is one of the working tools for the base of the pyramid; the rest of Lencioni belongs in the Teams chapter.
- Quiet (Cain) — introverts in leadership
- Susan Cain's published research from Quiet (2012). Roughly a third to a half of people are introverts; standard leadership advice systematically over-rewards extraversion. Introverts often lead well through deep one-on-one work, careful preparation, and quieter authority. The Lodge has both kinds in every room; an extraverted Worshipful Master leading an introverted line needs to know what he's working with.